<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>GISIntersect.com - Latest Comments</title><link>http://gisintersectcom.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://gisintersectcom.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:35:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: PostGIS How-to: NetCDF to PostGIS</title><link>http://www.gisintersect.com/?p=186#comment-997426161</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there. Just came accross this post. It's exactly what I'm looking to do. I wonder given that the post is quite old, whether you knew of any newer (better?) ways of doing this now though? Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James David Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:35:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PostGIS How-to: NetCDF to PostGIS</title><link>http://www.gisintersect.com/?p=186#comment-407343227</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This may come in very handy, converting individual GRIB files into a netCDF 'cube' for import to PostGIS. Thanks a lot!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Me</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:07:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PostGIS How-to: NetCDF to PostGIS</title><link>http://www.gisintersect.com/?p=186#comment-366480374</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mike,&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your suggestion. I will look into it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andreas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 04:49:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PostGIS How-to: NetCDF to PostGIS</title><link>http://www.gisintersect.com/?p=186#comment-364446514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Doing INSERT statements does the work, but it can be slow. I find that COPY table_name FROM is much quicker.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Furthermore, I recently figured out how to keep things binary so that you don't loose any precision from your floating point numbers, take a look at &lt;a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8144002/use-binary-copy-to-with-psycopg2-to-preserve-floating-point-numbers/8150329#8150329" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8144002/use-binary-copy-to-with-psycopg2-to-preserve-floating-point-numbers/8150329#8150329"&gt;http://stackoverflow.com/qu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeT</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:07:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Natural Earth &amp;#8211; Free Raster and Vector Data</title><link>http://www.gisintersect.com/?p=117#comment-354046119</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the promo!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathaniel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:45:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>